<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Web Dark Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com</link>
	<description>Black and white analogue photography explained</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Paper Negative workshop by Andrea Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=570&#038;cpage=1#comment-8334</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=570#comment-8334</guid>
		<description>I wish........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Long lasting by Rolo</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=494&#038;cpage=1#comment-7543</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=494#comment-7543</guid>
		<description>I suppose we all think about this from time to time.  

Start on the premise that negatives are worthless and of of no interest to anyone.  They will be a burden to the next generation.  What on earth would they do with them ?  They are yours, a record of your activity in a raw form.  If you&#039;re a Magnum photographer, or a frequently hung artist that can compete with Ansel Adams in a commercial sense, or a collection at the V&amp;A, that&#039;s different.

On the other hand, the finished work we&#039;ve created can live on.  Prints and books have a future, so frame a few of the most interesting, create a high quality portfolio in a book/s and give them to anyone you think might look at them in 10 years time.  Realistically, it should contain the history of your life with many portraits of you and your family.  What a drystone wall  looked like on a winters morning is not of interest to family, sorry.

My best friend of 25 years died suddenly and his family couldn&#039;t bear to throw his work away.  They didn&#039;t want it, had no room for his equipment and no desire to develop the skills to process them .  So, the negs came to me and I cut the 23 binders down to 4.  Now after 10 years of never being required, it&#039;s going to the rubbish tip on the next clear out.

Photography is a hobby; a pastime; a profession and the satisfaction belongs to the creator.  If one&#039;s images are not in demand during your life, they won&#039;t be after.  Even Flickr will only accept a 2 year subscription.  Make some books.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose we all think about this from time to time.  </p>
<p>Start on the premise that negatives are worthless and of of no interest to anyone.  They will be a burden to the next generation.  What on earth would they do with them ?  They are yours, a record of your activity in a raw form.  If you&#8217;re a Magnum photographer, or a frequently hung artist that can compete with Ansel Adams in a commercial sense, or a collection at the V&amp;A, that&#8217;s different.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the finished work we&#8217;ve created can live on.  Prints and books have a future, so frame a few of the most interesting, create a high quality portfolio in a book/s and give them to anyone you think might look at them in 10 years time.  Realistically, it should contain the history of your life with many portraits of you and your family.  What a drystone wall  looked like on a winters morning is not of interest to family, sorry.</p>
<p>My best friend of 25 years died suddenly and his family couldn&#8217;t bear to throw his work away.  They didn&#8217;t want it, had no room for his equipment and no desire to develop the skills to process them .  So, the negs came to me and I cut the 23 binders down to 4.  Now after 10 years of never being required, it&#8217;s going to the rubbish tip on the next clear out.</p>
<p>Photography is a hobby; a pastime; a profession and the satisfaction belongs to the creator.  If one&#8217;s images are not in demand during your life, they won&#8217;t be after.  Even Flickr will only accept a 2 year subscription.  Make some books.  <img src='http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A return to Paper Negative by Gary Liggett</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559&#038;cpage=1#comment-6994</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Liggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559#comment-6994</guid>
		<description>I know exactly what you mean.  Sometimes the array of photographic processes can make me feel like a &#039;kid in a candy store&#039; in wanting to try them all.  I soon discovered the dangers of spreading myself too thinly!  You are a very talented artist, Andrew, and it&#039;s good to see you back.  Not only that, but setting a very high standard with these lovely and timeless photographs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly what you mean.  Sometimes the array of photographic processes can make me feel like a &#8216;kid in a candy store&#8217; in wanting to try them all.  I soon discovered the dangers of spreading myself too thinly!  You are a very talented artist, Andrew, and it&#8217;s good to see you back.  Not only that, but setting a very high standard with these lovely and timeless photographs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A return to Paper Negative by Carl Radford</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559&#038;cpage=1#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Radford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559#comment-6990</guid>
		<description>Nice to have you back Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to have you back Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A return to Paper Negative by Andrea Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559&#038;cpage=1#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=559#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Good to hear you&#039;ll be doing more paper neg work. Love that side of your  work. Would love to see how you might approach something along the lines of ParkeHarrison&#039;s - The Architec&#039;s Brother
http://www.geh.org/parkeharrison/index.htm

Take very good care
Andrea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear you&#8217;ll be doing more paper neg work. Love that side of your  work. Would love to see how you might approach something along the lines of ParkeHarrison&#8217;s &#8211; The Architec&#8217;s Brother<br />
<a href="http://www.geh.org/parkeharrison/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.geh.org/parkeharrison/index.htm</a></p>
<p>Take very good care<br />
Andrea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Snow scenes again by moncler homme</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=411&#038;cpage=1#comment-5555</link>
		<dc:creator>moncler homme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=411#comment-5555</guid>
		<description>I tried emailing but I&#039;m not positive if it was sent, so I?ve left a comment just to say that I?ve given you a spot on the featured resource list on our web website.Wonderful blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried emailing but I&#8217;m not positive if it was sent, so I?ve left a comment just to say that I?ve given you a spot on the featured resource list on our web website.Wonderful blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using light meters intelligently by bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=527&#038;cpage=1#comment-5165</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=527#comment-5165</guid>
		<description>I read Mark&#039;s comment, and I had to stop and think about it for a moment. You wouldn&#039;t OPEN two stops from the meter reading  if you&#039;re metering a deep shadow. The meter would look at that shadow and (as you explain so succinctly) give a reading to render it a middle gray - which would require either a slower shutter speed or wider aperture. Either way, in order to properly render the deep shadows properly using the spot meter technique described, you would STOP DOWN two stops - not open up... Your explanation of &quot;underexpose that reading by two stops&quot; is the same way of looking at the situation. 

I just wanted to clear it up because I put up a link to this great article, and then some questions as to whether the proper thing to do is OPEN the aperture - or stop down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Mark&#8217;s comment, and I had to stop and think about it for a moment. You wouldn&#8217;t OPEN two stops from the meter reading  if you&#8217;re metering a deep shadow. The meter would look at that shadow and (as you explain so succinctly) give a reading to render it a middle gray &#8211; which would require either a slower shutter speed or wider aperture. Either way, in order to properly render the deep shadows properly using the spot meter technique described, you would STOP DOWN two stops &#8211; not open up&#8230; Your explanation of &#8220;underexpose that reading by two stops&#8221; is the same way of looking at the situation. </p>
<p>I just wanted to clear it up because I put up a link to this great article, and then some questions as to whether the proper thing to do is OPEN the aperture &#8211; or stop down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Words are the enemy by Gary Liggett</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556&#038;cpage=1#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Liggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>Bang on!  For me, the rot started when Art Colleges - which were entirely focussed on the creative, were subsumed into effing universities.  Whoever learned how to be creative by writing about it?  Did the success of Van Gough or Monet depend on a 2000 word essay?  I bet some of the greatest artists in history couldn&#039;t even write, but they could paint a 1000 words, and then some. 

When I was at art college, I was fortunate to be taught by a master, who taught me how to visualise a scene... to think in pictures...think about the way I should compose image to  the best creative effect.  The camera was only brought in at the last moment to record what I saw and wanted to portray.   None this &#039;looking through the viewfinder and shooting away&#039; like an American tourist in the hope that one of the frames &#039;turned out right&#039;.  In that respect, on of my heroes is Thomas Joshua Cooper.  He travels to the farthest corners of the planet and makes just on photograph.  All of this stood me in good stead when I was making films -  I had to think is moving images, which fell continuously one after the other 1/25th of a second at a time.  

Likewise, I spend weeks planning and thinking visually about a photograph: when the light will do its thing for me; when the landscape will look how I want it.  On the right day, at the right time, I make sure I am there with my trusty old Thornton Pickard half-plate or my Houghton Ensign 6x9 to allow the beautiful light to fall onto the emulsion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bang on!  For me, the rot started when Art Colleges &#8211; which were entirely focussed on the creative, were subsumed into effing universities.  Whoever learned how to be creative by writing about it?  Did the success of Van Gough or Monet depend on a 2000 word essay?  I bet some of the greatest artists in history couldn&#8217;t even write, but they could paint a 1000 words, and then some. </p>
<p>When I was at art college, I was fortunate to be taught by a master, who taught me how to visualise a scene&#8230; to think in pictures&#8230;think about the way I should compose image to  the best creative effect.  The camera was only brought in at the last moment to record what I saw and wanted to portray.   None this &#8216;looking through the viewfinder and shooting away&#8217; like an American tourist in the hope that one of the frames &#8216;turned out right&#8217;.  In that respect, on of my heroes is Thomas Joshua Cooper.  He travels to the farthest corners of the planet and makes just on photograph.  All of this stood me in good stead when I was making films &#8211;  I had to think is moving images, which fell continuously one after the other 1/25th of a second at a time.  </p>
<p>Likewise, I spend weeks planning and thinking visually about a photograph: when the light will do its thing for me; when the landscape will look how I want it.  On the right day, at the right time, I make sure I am there with my trusty old Thornton Pickard half-plate or my Houghton Ensign 6&#215;9 to allow the beautiful light to fall onto the emulsion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Words are the enemy by Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556&#038;cpage=1#comment-4665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556#comment-4665</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more Andrew. That was my problem in 2nd year, too much reading/writing about photography and not doing the kind of work i enjoy. All change in 3rd year though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more Andrew. That was my problem in 2nd year, too much reading/writing about photography and not doing the kind of work i enjoy. All change in 3rd year though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Words are the enemy by Sarah O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556&#038;cpage=1#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdarkroom.com/?p=556#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more Andrew. The world is full of distractions and it is so easy to get caught up in daily life and forget to look around you. One of my new resolutions is to look up towards the sky more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more Andrew. The world is full of distractions and it is so easy to get caught up in daily life and forget to look around you. One of my new resolutions is to look up towards the sky more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

